arablop.blogg.se - Fastest nas for mac

#Fastest nas for mac install
#Fastest nas for mac plus
#Fastest nas for mac free
#Fastest nas for mac mac

This will allow you to set up a directory that will sync across all devices you tell Synology Drive Client to use on those devices.

#Fastest nas for mac install

For example, you can install Cloud Station (now called Synology Drive) on the NAS, and Synology Drive Client on your machines that you use to connect to the NAS (your Mac, PC, etc.). You can do it this way, but it will eat up some space. Maybe there's a way to delete emails older than 5 years on my email?

#Fastest nas for mac free

Is there a way to have my email on the NAS? If yes, I think that would bring my iCloud needs down to the free tier of 5 GB. I currently subscribe to the 2 TB iCloud plan and the goal is to get it significantly below 50 GB so that my subscription for iCloud storage will be only $1 per month. Will it be as easy as simply syncing my current Music (iTunes) folder with the library and its files to the NAS? I also bought quite a few movies from the iTunes Store that used to be stored in the iTunes folder, but I see now the iTunes folder doesn't exist anymore? Anyway, in broad terms/outline what are the best ways of getting my music, movies, photos to the NAS and accessing them? I plan on stopping my Apple Music subscription as mostly listen to my music that I ripped from CDs anyway. Is Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) as stable, reliable, and secure as traditional RAID? The benefit of SHR is that I can increase the size of the NAS much more easily than RAID 10 down the road? I like how RAID 10 increases read and write speeds.

#Fastest nas for mac plus

Spent way more than I planned for my first NAS, $1k for DS 920+ and four 4 TB WD Red Plus HDDs. I can't say what the current crop is like. Not in the same class as any full-featured NAS. Acceptable for backups, but not very useful for working on served files. As I recall, network performance was poor too.

WD My Cloud: I have not looked at one in years.but last time I did, they had very limited functionality, and had slow interfaces. You will notice in the B&H link above they also sell them paired with a bunch of different HD options, including 2 x 14TB. I only see one Seagate HD that is not compatible, and it is specific for surveillance. I have never had any issue with any popular HDs not being compatible. Synology has an extensive list of compatible drives here. B&H carries them, as do New Egg and many reputable online vendors.Īs for drives.not sure where you found that info. Never been an issue for me, mostly because I am not close to any big tech vendors anyways. Yes.Synology is not very common in brick and mortar stores. I have had good luck with the WD red drives in several NAS boxes and attached storage arrays. Nope.Server is no longer what it used to be, so no benefit as a NAS (it still does a couple of other things, but nothing file serving specific). PROS: Lower cost, more compact, dedicated headless, more functionality and flexibility The 220+ is likely cheaper and is more compact (one box, one plug, etc.). If buying gear, one would need both the Mini and an external storage box.

Drive tool to automatically sync and backup.including over the internet without having to do router config or network tweaks.

Very cross-platform if you want to share with other devices (Win, iOS, Android, etc).

Ability to swap drives on the fly, including increasing a volume size without erasing and reformatting.

Built-in RAID redundancies (for multi-drive models).

Web interface, no monitor needed, no remote desktop setup needed.

If starting fresh and buying hardware, I still vote for the Synology. If you have a Mini to spare, this is a pretty good option.

#Fastest nas for mac mac

Click to is no longer what it used to be, so no benefit as a NAS (it still does a couple of other things, but nothing file serving specific).įor file sharing, you don't need anything extra, you can use any Mac as a local file server with no additional software.